Talk:Talk That Talk (Twice song)

Talk That Talk (Twice song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 24, 2025	Good article nominee	Listed

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Talk That Talk (Twice song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Talk That Talk (Twice song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 18:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I was about to review "Bottle Pop", however it got picked up by another review so congrats on having the oldest pending songs GAN besides my own haha! --K. Peake 18:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

The refs for genres should not be in the infobox when this is already sourced in the body
Shouldn't Lee Woo-min "Collapsedone" be in the same name order for both the infobox and lead?
Mention in the first sentence that the song was for "their eleventh extended play, Between 1&2 (2022)."
"It was released" → "The song was released"
"as the lead single of" → chop this down to "as the album's lead single".
Remove the word "lush" as this is too much detail for the lead
Capitalise "Collapsedone" in prose
"The track peaked at" → "The song peaked at"
"and in the top-ten in" → "and within the top-10 in" per MOS:NUM on comparative values, though please remove New Zealand since that is not the main chart

Release and promotion

Make this the second section instead
Img looks good!
The announcement having taken place on July 13 is not sourced
"on August 26," → "on August 26, 2022,"
"The group held a" → "Twice held a"
Wikilink music video

Composition and lyrics

Retitle to Background and composition and make this the first section, as Lee Woo-min's involvement details offer some background
The composer credits are not sourced
"a captivating chorus."" → "a captivating chorus"." per MOS:QUOTE, also only invoke the NME ref here as it is the only one used for this info and place that with the other two at the end of the previous sentence that uses info from all three
"with "Talk That Talk," they" → "with "Talk That Talk", they"
"from "Do It Again," from" → "of "Do It Again", from"
Mention the debut album by name and add the release year in brackets
Re-invoke [13] at the end of the penultimate sentence due to usage of direct quoting

Reception

Place some of the NME review into your own words per MOS:OVERQUOTE
Any more reviews to be added to prose?
Create a second para for the commercial performance here, as everything written in the lead needs to be sourced in the body
Table looks good!

Music video

"On August 24 and 25, the group released" → "On August 24 and 25, 2022, Twice released"
Img looks good!
"together since debut." → "together since the group's debut."
Last para looks good!

Credits and personnel

Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel

Charts

Good

Certifications

Good

Release history

Format → Format(s)
Label → Label(s)

References

Copyvio score looks very good at 28.1%!!!
Fix MOS:QWQ issues and cite Grammy Awards as publisher instead on ref 4
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 6 and 9
Cite GMA Network as publisher instead on ref 7
Cite Osen as publisher instead on ref 12
Fix MOS:CAPS issues and per WP:RSSM, is ref 20 really reliable?
Fix MOS:CAPS issues and cite Melon as publisher instead on ref 25
Cite Dutch Top 40 as publisher instead on ref 33
Cite Circle Chart as publisher instead on refs 38, 44 and 45
Wikilink Billboard Vietnam on ref 43

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed; wrapped this one up quickly! --K. Peake 21:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake i think I have fixed everything you have mentioned! Lililolol (talk) 19:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lililolol Thanks for the response just before seven days and I am happy to see this of course, however you still need to implement some more changes. Please remove refs from the infobox, change the track to the song in the lead, fix MOS:QUOTE issues with "a captivating chorus"., re-invoke [13] where stated, create a commercial performance para and fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 9. --K. Peake 21:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake Hi, sorry for the late response. I think I've fixed everything. I don't see the need for a paragraph on commercial performance since it's already shown in the charts section! Lililolol (talk) 19:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lililolol As a rule of thumb, everything written in the lead needs to be in prose within the body so add the commercial performance please. --K. Peake 21:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake Sorry for the late response. I have added a Commercial Success section, but I couldn't reuse the Billboard Global 200 reference because I don't know how to add a citation when it is inside a table Lililolol (talk) 02:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass now, I was going to do this earlier but had to catch a long bus journey! --K. Peake 21:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]