Talk:Tübingen School

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the biblical criticism work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Tübingen School is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page); Kazimieras Vasiliauskas (monsignor)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Why does Tübingen school redirect to higher criticism when there is no longer any reference to Tubingen in the article. Shouldn't it be an article in its own right?

For now, it redirects to FC Baur, where there is coverage of the tubingen school. If someone wants to make TS an article, go for it. Jonathan Tweet 04:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page creator attribution

Hi @Sennecaster, you rejected my request for a move request here. Since I created this page by translating it from German (before that it was an empty redirect), I think it's only fair that page-creation attribution be attributed to whoever created the page with content, and then the prior redirect page can be redirected to it. For now I redacted my contribution in protest. Best. Xpander (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain your motives for blanking such a page? There is no problem for editors to expand on an article you created, is there really a need to blank a page out of shame and/or protest? This constitutes as petty edit warring. @Wikishovel I would like a perspective on this from your side as you are involved as well. MimirIsSmart (talk) 07:44, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MimirIsSmart I in fact encourage other people's edits, see our discussion on the WP:TEAHOUSE that's why I created Protestant and Catholic Tübingen School to continue the improvements from there. but @Wikishovel thinks that that page mus be deleted. My argument is very simple: we must distinguish between valid-article-creators and redirect-page-creators. Before my edit, that page had no significant history, so I don't see what all the fuss is about. Xpander (talk) 07:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Xpander1, why must we distinguish between valid-article-creators and redirect-page-creators? Wikishovel (talk) 08:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to fresh start an article just BECAUSE it was a redirect. It is not a hypothetical blemish on the article's history and creating pages is not a competition. In this case, it does not even need to be moved for an incorrect name. This is a non-problem stretched out to an absurd edit war. MimirIsSmart (talk) 08:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm mystified by all of this. Anyone looking at the page's edit history can see that Xpander1 started the article, and they can link to it from an "Articles created" section at their user page. It doesn't matter that it began as a redirect needing expansion to an article. Wikishovel (talk) 07:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All this confusion could have been avoided If the edits continued here: Protestant and Catholic Tübingen School Xpander (talk) 08:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is a copy and paste move really necessary just for a really small problem like this? MimirIsSmart (talk) 08:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valuing other people's works is not an small issue. @MimirIsSmart Xpander (talk) 08:50, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]