Talk:Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 200-metre butterfly

Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 200-metre butterfly has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 4, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France: Paris Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Paris task force.

Swimming Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Green: Wildcard Edition

This article was created or improved during the Wildcard Edition GA edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Green project in May 2025. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green

GA icon symbolizing Good topic candidates on Wikipedia.

Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 200-metre butterfly is part of the "Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics" series, a current good topic candidate. A good topic should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet several criteria. Please feel free to leave comments.

Repeating error in Shedule section

There is a repeating error in all the articles on the 2024 Olympics swimming in the Schedule section. The links to the sources are dead or missing, and the start times indicated are the same: 10:00 - 19:37 - 17:30 -- Karavadgoo (talk) 11:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think all this is fixed. IAWW (talk) 21:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 21:47, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 200 metre butterfly/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 00:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 22:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will review this article. -Riley1012 (talk) 22:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

...and in the semifinals Denmark's Helena Rosendahl Bach broke her nation's record... Add a comma after "semifinals".
In the final, Zhang took an early lead, but was overtaken by McIntosh... Remove the comma after "lead".
20 year old Elizabeth Dekkers from Australia was the 2023 World Championships silver medallist and was also on a positive improvement trajectory. Spell out "Twenty" to avoid beginning a sentence with a numeral per MOS:NUMERAL.
Zhang qualified as top seed, swimming 2:06:55... This should say as the top seed.
McIntosh qualified with the fastest seed of 2:04.87... This should either be qualified with the fastest time or qualified as the top seed.
At 65 m, Zhang had extended her lead to 0.50, but by 100 m McIntosh... You should write out metres here for consistency with the rest of the paragraph.

2. Verifiable
The article uses reliable sources that are listed properly in the References section without major missing information. Passes Earwig's (the 23.1% similarity is from a properly-attributed quote). Spot check: 1, 3, 9, 11, 13, 19, and 20 are all good.

3. Broad
All the major aspects of the event are covered without going into unnecessary detail.

4. Neutral
The article is neutral in its tone and properly attributes opinions.

5. Stable
I looked at the talk page and article history to verify that there are no ongoing content disputes.

6. Illustrated
The image of the arena is in the public domain under CC0 license, is relevant to the event, and has a suitable caption.

Okay It is a wonderful world, I am done with the review. My suggested changes are pretty minor. -Riley1012 (talk) 18:35, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much @Riley1012, I have fixed your concerns which were all very helpful. IAWW (talk) 19:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response! -Riley1012 (talk) 21:47, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Excessive redundant filler detail in lead

No Olympic event ever talks about how big an Olympic pool is. That belongs in the general article. This is a specific event and not one to explain the rules to others. So unnecessary detail removed from lead in line with MOS:LEDE. Issue has already been discussed and agreed: Talk:Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 100 metre freestyle#top. More info: User:IP49XX/Why MOS Matters. IP49XX (talk) 03:35, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]