Talk:Super-resolution imaging
![]() | The content of Super-resolution was merged into Super-resolution imaging on July 24, 2012. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hyphen or not
[edit]The unhyphenated form superresolution, used even at the beginning of the subject [1], seems now to have superseded the less-often used super-resolution -- see Optics Info Base. I propose that the redirect be not from superresolution to super-resolution but the other way. If the abbreviation SR is used in the rest of the entry, there should be no problem.Gwestheimer 16:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- ^ McCutchen C. J. opt. Soc. Am. 57:1190, 1967
Trying for an entry that gives an overall layout of the subject and conveys the essential concepts, I have opted for a separate page entitled "Superresolution" rather than shoehorning the material into the current more technically-oriented page "Super-resolution." This involves undoing the re-direct from "Superresolution" to "Super-resolution" and inserting into each of these pages a reference to the other under "See also."
Gwestheimer 18:23, 19 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwestheimer (talk • contribs)
- That was a terrible idea. There is no reason why we can't have both the technical and the non-technical in the same article. And then to have the only difference be the hyphen is even worse. I'm recombining the pages. Ego White Tray (talk) 12:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with Ego White Tray, to the contrary, that was my original intent, except that I found the job of integrating the two entries and dealing with the tags and the many self-serving references too daunting. But I will now have a go at it. So Wiki-constabulary, please hold off tagging for a week or two.Gwestheimer 22:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwestheimer (talk • contribs)
More on which techniques for which applications
[edit]Which techniques are used on aerial photography or on satellite imagery or for optical astronomy ? Is multi-frame SR the main technique ? Are there SR techniques specific to enhancing video ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
The 2nd sentence of the intro is long, and perhaps too complicated for the intro ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Question on introduction
[edit]Are MRI and Computed Tomography really examples of radar/sonar applications? - Evariste1832 (talk) 12:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class electrical engineering articles
- Mid-importance electrical engineering articles
- Electrical engineering articles
- Start-Class Systems articles
- Mid-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in visualization
- WikiProject Systems articles
- Start-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles