A fact from Stoned at the Nail Salon appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 August 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lorde, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.LordeWikipedia:WikiProject LordeTemplate:WikiProject LordeLorde
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: This is my first DYK nomination, and a self-nomination at that, so while I've read up on the rules and looked at other comparable nominations, there is probably some sort of mistake here. If there's any issue that needs improving with the hook or the article, let me know and I'll try my best to fix it.
Overall: Article new enough, long enough and is neutral and well-sourced. Earwig did not pick up anything major. I don't find ALT1 interesting but ALT0 is interesting and cited in article. However, while this may just be my personal preference, I think the hook should include that the song is written by Lorde and that it would be hookier without naming the backing artists (unless they're really big where they're from. Are they?) Nominator has no prior DYK credits so no QPQ needed. Pamzeis (talk) 03:57, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I do kind of agree about ALT1. Just provided it for the purpose of an alternative hook. As for ALT0, could these alternatives work? @Pamzeis:
Lead should probably cover how well it did and how critics received it.
Not done Added information on critical reception to lede, but not really sure what to add re: the song's performance. Chart-wise, there wasn't anything that remarkable aside from "it charted", except for maybe its no 22 placement in NZ. --LivelyRatification (talk) 07:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]