Talk:South African labour law

This page was proposed for deletion by QueensanditsCrazy (talk · contribs) on 29 October 2024.

South Africa Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Mid‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expansion

There's some phenomenal work being done here. The page is rich, and everything added looks great. It's also time to create sub-pages, and to reduce the amount of text, and especially the headings and content sub-categories on this page. This will improve things a lot for readers: big pages like this are necessarily summaries. Wik idea 14:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support split - I just added {{toolong}} and {{split-apart}} tags to the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, the page should be shortened in some places, but I wouldn't say split exactly. Subpages should be created for material to expand there in detail. Wik idea 13:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Length of article

Should this article be divided into smaller articles? 86.133.243.146 (talk) 01:14, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is better just to delete all the duplicated crap PM ME URANUS (talk) 21:28, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Removal of duplicated text

After a series of big edits, we're exactly back to the version from 20 November. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]