Talk:Something Beautiful (Miley Cyrus album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Something Beautiful (Miley Cyrus album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Miley Cyrus Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Miley Cyrus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Miley Cyrus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Miley CyrusWikipedia:WikiProject Miley CyrusTemplate:WikiProject Miley CyrusMiley Cyrus
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No MOS:OVERLINK violation

Linking the term studio album in the lead is not a violation of the over-linking policy; if it were, then anything that does repeat from {{Infobox album}} in the lead would not link, as well. MOS:REPEATLINK even states: Other mentions may be linked if helpful, such as in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, and hatnotes. MOS:CONTEXTLINK also states: The first sentence should provide links to the broader or more elementary topics that are important to the article's topic or place it into the context where it is notable. And while other stuff does exist, several album-related good articles (i.e., Abbey Road, The Beatles) do include the linking. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Studio album link is actually not needed in this article, also it is not even crucial word. There's no reason to put a wikilink on it. Per MOS:LEADLINK, Too many links can make the lead hard to read.

+ Not going to consider other articles as one of the reasons for this, per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 16:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The linking of studio album and believing it makes the lead hard to read is subjective, especially in comparison to the other two-linked manual of styles. Again, linking in a table does not equate to not linking in the lead; if that were the case, Cyrus' name should not be linked, as it is linked not once but twice in the infobox template. Also, changing the article's linking right now, while discussion is ongoing, is in violation of WP:STONEWALL and is considered WP:DISRUPTIVE—until discussion is finished, or more become involved, it should not be changed—especially per WP:BRD. And I already noted that other stuff exists. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:22, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again too, as 'studio album' term isn't regarded as necessary in lead section, no reason to put wikilink on it. Also even you already noted that other stuff exists, it doesn't mean this can be accepted. Moreover, I didn't know that discussion was already opened before. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 16:42, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then, by that argument, there's no reason to wiki-link to lead single, as it's not a necessary link nor does it provide notable context to the article or its lead, whereas linking to studio album would (considering this is an album article). But to use the argument of it being linked in the album infobox would also deem Cyrus' name, record label, any of the released singles, producers, last-released release would also not be linked (again) per your argument, would it not? livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are the proper nouns. So it is meaningful to put wikilinks on them. Also, I would opposite to wikilink on single, but not on lead single. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 21:41, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

End of the World draft

Starting a page here, to avoid WP:TOOSOON

Draft:End of the World (Miley Cyrus song)

Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can editors come help decide if this draft should be submitted for review? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft for title track

Draft:Something Beautiful (Miley Cyrus song)

---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]