Talk:Siege of Golconda/GA1
GA review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Gowhk8 (talk · contribs) 04:55, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Borsoka (talk · contribs) 13:24, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Image review
- File:Rocketsiegegolconda.jpg: US PD tag is needed at Commons. Borsoka (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Source review
- List all cited sources in section Bibliography following ABC order, and apply a citation style consequently.
- Add the same information at each titles cited in the bibliography. Borsoka (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
@Gowhk8: when do you think you can address the above issues? Borsoka (talk) 07:24, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- I've corrected the order to be alphabetical. What do you mean about the citation style? What do you mean by "add the same info at each title"? Gowhk8 (talk) 03:31, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
- Compare references 3 and 5 in section "Citations". In section "Bibliography", the same info should be listed at each title. Compare them, and you will understand. Borsoka (talk) 06:38, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
@Gowhk8:, any comments? Borsoka (talk) 06:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)