Talk:Short and long titles
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of Long title was merged into Short and long titles on 21 October 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Comment
[edit]Surely the name 'Bill of Rights' didn't come out of nowhere, and the Act had been known as this informally before it was given the name by the Short Titles Act? Morwen - Talk 10:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Counterexample
[edit]The act respecting the exercise of the fundamental rights and prerogatives of the Québec people and the Québec State, from Canada, is a counterexample---even though its not national/federal law, it seems that passing a bill without a short title is not a disallowed action. 118.90.65.233 (talk) 12:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
merge
[edit]Short and long titles only make sense in comparison. Fgnievinski (talk) 01:12, 9 July 2015 (UTC)