Talk:Sathariel

nabbing away at the article?

When we have two different sources that is usually enough for keeping stuff on wikipedia. If I find a 3rd source would that be enough? Its quite damn obvious that this will be fringe sources, its occultism after all... What do we gain from essentially erasing this article? Maybe we could add to the article instead? Like if you want non-fringe that still is fringe to most people then use mathers shadowside book, likely kalrsson stole much from there.

Crowley and golden dawn have the same view about what forces rule the upper triad where sathariel is included (since crowley stole so much from them), but modern groups often reject that picture and make up their own model of the tree, and the purpose of citing totbl/dragon rouge was to highlight that · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 16:51, 23 March 2025 (UTC)