Talk:Rugg v Ryan
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rugg v Ryan redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
| This page was proposed for deletion by Simba1409 (talk · contribs) on 23 April 2023 with the comment: Does not meet WP:GNG. Case has not even gone to trial yet and if no new precedent is set in the outcome of this case, then the court case certainly will not be notable in the slightest. The existence of this court action is best covered on the individual Wikipedia pages of those involved (which it already is). It was contested by GMH Melbourne (talk · contribs) on 23 April 2023 with the comment: A simple google search of 'Rugg v Ryan' provides more than enough sources to establish notability in line with WP:GNG. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Settlement
[edit]Oh would you look at that. The case amounted to nothing. Shocking.
This article should now be deleted. Simba1409 (talk) 13:17, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class Australia pages
- NA-importance Australia pages
- Redirect-Class Australian law pages
- NA-importance Australian law pages
- WikiProject Australian law articles
- Redirect-Class Australian politics pages
- NA-importance Australian politics pages
- WikiProject Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Redirect-Class law pages
- NA-importance law pages
- WikiProject Law articles