Talk:Rocket Lab Neutron

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rocket Lab Neutron article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocketry

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a vehicle diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots, or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

On 15 July 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Neutron (rocket). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Barge "Return On Investment" draft article

The barge's draft article is at DRAFT: Rocket Lab Return On Investment -- 65.93.183.181 (talk) 22:14, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 July 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) TarnishedPath^talk 05:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket Lab Neutron → Neutron (rocket) – I can't find evidence that "Rocket Lab Neutron" is used as the name of this rocket. Instead, it seems to be called simply "Neutron". While the current name is not ambiguous, it's therefore not a likely search-term and not in keeping with Wikipedia:WikiProject Rocketry/Naming conventions. See also Talk:Curie (rocket engine)#Requested move 13 August 2020 for another set of their products. This is not my usual topic-area, so I'm RM rather than bold action to see if there is something I'm missing. DMacks (talk) 00:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise:

Rocket Lab Electron → Electron (rocket)
Rocket Lab Photon → Photon (rocket)

Didn't notice the set at first, but they should obviously be kept self-consistent and my rationale equally applies to all of them. DMacks (talk) 00:42, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose WP:NATURALDAB This is a commercial product, like other commercial products, can easily be disambiguated naturally by the manufacturer name. The rocket is closely related to the company. The two are almost never found without each other in reliable sources, there is no use of "Neutron" or "Electron" without "Rocket Lab" in close association. In RS, you can find "Rocket Lab Neutron" though more commonly it appears as "Rocket Lab's Neutron". That shows that the topic is not separately known independently of the company. And Photon is not a rocket. -- In this matter, it is clearly different from the F1 rocket engine or Saturn V, where a manufacturer is almost never mentioned. -- 65.93.183.181 (talk) 03:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I spot-checked the cited refs (again, a different set than I had previously), and I stand by my position that they do not generally write it with the company name in this style phrasing. It's only written that way when the source wants to emphasize the company as the producer, not as the general name of this thing itself. Whatever Photon is, it's the same situation...I'm obviously not wedded to "(rocket)" if that's not the correct word (the guideline I cited is flexible about that). DMacks (talk) 03:54, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I pinged Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight, since WikiProject Rocketry seems fairly inactive. DMacks (talk) 00:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - By default we follow WP:Naming conventions (aircraft) unless there's a good reason to deviate from it. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 09:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Does that guideline agree with Wikipedia:WikiProject Rocketry/Naming conventions? DMacks (talk) 13:14, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose [Manufacturer]-[Name] seems to be the standard and is reflected in WP:NCAIRCRAFT. I am puzzled by the italics in the name. We don't do that for Boeing 787 Dreamliner so I think it should be removed from this one too. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 15:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concur, and done. As for the question about the convention used by WikiProject Rocketry, that works because the systems they cover largely have military 'designations' whereas space launch systems by and large do not. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 19:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ahah! That makes more sense now. Based on how it was written typographically and the level of detail from skimming the article, I understood this to be a specific individual named vehicle rather than a type or class of which several might exist. DMacks (talk) 14:51, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Neutron is class of vehicles

@DMacks: Yes you are right, there are other articles that phrase it better, e.g. Firefly Aerospace Blue Ghost, which could be used as a pattern to improve this article. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 00:33, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]