Talk:Rising Star Cave
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rising Star Cave article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Rising Star Cave be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in South Africa may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Additional sources
[edit]Lest it be thought this cave system/expedition was largely undocumented prior to September 2015, and with an eye towards WP:RECENTISM, here are some older/additional sources that may provide useful info and perspective.
- MacKinnon, Katherine C. (2014). "Contemporary Biological Anthropology in 2013: Integrative, Connected, and Relevant". American Anthropologist. 116 (2): 352–365. doi:10.1111/aman.12102.
- Wong, Kate (19 August 2014). "Evolution Rewritten". Scientific American. 311 (3): 36–39. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0914-36.
- Brahic, Catherine (November 2014). "Chamber of secrets". New Scientist. 224 (2997): 40–43. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(14)62292-2.
- Bernard Wood (2015). "Rising Star". Wiley Blackwell Student Dictionary of Human Evolution. Wiley. p. 376–. ISBN 978-1-118-33574-1.
Orientation of passages
[edit]In subsection Discovery of fossils in Dinaledi Chamber is a statement that recreational cavers found a narrow, vertically oriented "chimney" or "chute." By the description, this is the Superman Crawl, which, like the Dragon's Back, is nearly horizontal. Is this some geological or speleological convention of which I am unaware, or did someone get dizzy? J S Ayer (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
To add to article
[edit]To add to this article: information about the geometrical engravings on the walls of certain chambers of the Rising Star cave system, which was released to the public on June 5, 2023. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 22:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- Done. -- GreenC 01:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
carvings
[edit]could be to maneuver in the dark via “feeling” the markings on which way to go. And only have to carry very little for one purposeful fire. 2600:1700:7890:69CF:7DFA:56DB:3E4F:ED25 (talk) 14:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's a fair idea, to explain the origin as bread crumbs, and over time they become more elaborate, the original purpose lost to time. For Wikipedia purposes it's WP:OR but maybe there is a source for this somewhere it doesn't need to be about this particular cave. -- GreenC 16:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Merge Proposal
[edit]Merging Underground Astronauts into the Rising Star Cave article: there is quite a bit of overlap between the two articles. Besides the names and affiliations of the researchers and a bit of context, the article is entirely restated in Rising Star Cave. Also, the subject’s notability is questionable: although this nickname has been used by the media, the articles that use this nickname in their titles or text focus on the cave & fossils more than the details of the researchers involved. PaulTheBoatman10 (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- Support No reason to separate these topics and agree with the overlap and lack of notability to create a separate article. "Lumping" vs. "Splitting" is always an issue with articles, but unless there is a compelling reason to split, it's better for readers to have the information in one place. -- GreenC 14:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've copied over the missing information and merged the articles. PaulTheBoatman10 (talk) 16:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- @PaulTheBoatman10: Your 'merged' version was missing almost all of the content from Underground Astronauts? – Joe (talk) 08:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Joe Roe: What content was missing? Rising Star Cave already contained ~90% of the info on Underground Astronauts. PaulTheBoatman10 (talk) 08:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Information on their recruitment from the lead and controversy section; the description of their work from the 'The Rising Star Expedition'; any biographical details beyond their names. – Joe (talk) 08:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Joe Roe: What content was missing? Rising Star Cave already contained ~90% of the info on Underground Astronauts. PaulTheBoatman10 (talk) 08:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- @PaulTheBoatman10: Your 'merged' version was missing almost all of the content from Underground Astronauts? – Joe (talk) 08:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Anthropology articles
- High-importance Anthropology articles
- C-Class Caves articles
- Low-importance Caves articles
- WikiProject Caves articles
- C-Class Palaeontology articles
- Mid-importance Palaeontology articles
- C-Class Palaeontology articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- C-Class South Africa articles
- Low-importance South Africa articles
- WikiProject South Africa articles
- Wikipedia requested images of palaeontology
- Wikipedia requested photographs in South Africa