Talk:Regine at the Movies/Archive 1

Archive 1

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the 2001 concert residency Regine at the Movies was re-staged seventeen years later? Source: Regine sings movie themes Regine sings film themes
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Esperanza Casteleiro

Created by Pseud 14 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC).

• Comments by Tbhotch

General eligibility:

• New enough:
• Long enough:
• Other problems:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

The hook should drop the "in 2018" as it is redundant. A new and long-enough article. Earwig marks Violation Unlikely 37.5% but it's just a quote. QPQ done. I couldn't see any major issue. Good to go. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Regine at the Movies/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Onegreatjoke (talk · contribs) 18:56, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I have decided to review your nomination to see if your article can reach GA status. This is going to be my second GA review so I might make some mistakes here. If you see any then please notify me.

Alright! I have finished my review. I will put this review on hold as these problems are super easy to fix and shouldn't take long. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Onegreatjoke for taking the time to review the article. I have addressed the items you've raised in prose and references. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your work. Promoting. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Prose

For the Synopsis section

• "Velasquez spoke to the audience about her fascination of Baz Luhrmann's musical film Moulin Rouge! and continued to sing a medley of songs from the soundtrack album." should be --> "Velasquez spoke to the audience about her fascination with Baz Luhrmann's musical film Moulin Rouge! and continued to sing a medley of songs from the soundtrack album."

Alright. Time for the Reception and Recordings section.

• Done. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

• "On November 24, 2018, the second night of the show was broadcast via pay-per-view live streaming on Kapamilya Box Office." It would probably be better to say livestreaming instead.

• Done. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

That's it for prose!

Referenced

• Just a question. is there a way to access references 9 and 10 or are they offline? Other than that I have no problems.

• Thanks for raising this one. The source is the referenced media itself per Cite AV media notes, which is generally used for credits/personnel, concert booklets/programs/setlist, or in plot and setting sections of films/tv series. Similar examples [1] [2] Pseud 14 (talk) 20:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Copyvio

Earwig found nothing. This section is a pass.

Broad

Article seems broad so this section is a pass.

Neutral

Article looks neutral so this section is a pass.

Stable

No edits since July. This section is a pass.

Media

Only image seems to qualify under fair use. This section is a pass.