Jump to content

Talk:Ramon Magsaysay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Flag of the President of the Philippines.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Flag of the President of the Philippines.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overly positive coverage?

[edit]

There's literally nothing even partly negative about Magsaysay in the entire article, and many of the sources seem to be very old. It's entirely possible that this guy is a saint -- in which case I think he'd rank among the best leaders ever (eliminated corruption, boosted economy, ended gangs, expanded his country's influence, was loved by other countries, etc., etc.)

On the other hand, he was a CIA-backed leader trying to crush organized military movements in the country. Almost everyone else that has fit this description has turned out to be a Very Bad Person (tm), despite positive press from both the US and whatever nation that person was leading. I'm not saying that the CIA only backs evil villain-style dictators, but they sure do more than anyone else in the world -- especially the CIA in that time.

Anyone have anything negative about this guy? Is the article biased hugely pro-Magsaysay? Or is it accurate, and just lacks negative info because Magsaysay was a saint? OwenVersteeg (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Almost two years later, and it seems like this is still the case. Anyone want to help me take a look at this? At a cursory glance, lots of the article seems to be backed with propaganda, and the article still hails him as a saint. OwenVersteeg (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ramon Magsaysay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

U. S. Postage Stamp

[edit]

Use commons:File:RamonMagsaysayStamp.jpg.