This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWikipedia:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona
This confirmation process is historic. All who contributed should be included. Her contribution was important. Her conclusions were illuminating, to say the least.
An editor had posted material on the criticism of Mitchell's memo to the committee. This was removed by another editor as poorly crafted. I added back a sentence on the criticism as an important aspect of the event.Bjhillis (talk) 20:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell was referenced in the Department of Justice's 2024 report regarding the Phoenix Police Department's civil rights violations, together with improper charging and other ethical violations by the Maricopa County Attorney's Office. The Department of Justice discussed how police and prosecutors came to invent a gang and falsely charge protesters as members. A breakout section titled ‘The Genesis of the Gang Charges,” covers MCAO’s role in the scandal and how a prosecutor lost her law license. County Attorney Rachel Mitchell called the section about her office a “lie” at a press conference hosted by police union leaders. However, Mitchell said several things about the DOJ’s report that were misleading and not true. Source: Department of Justice 2024 Report 2600:8800:7217:3900:51D3:4EA4:996B:3832 (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]