Talk:Róa/GA1

GA review

Passed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:13, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Nascar9919 (talk · contribs) 06:53, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 01:14, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:14, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

First comments coming soon. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:36, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All copyrights are good and the fair use rationale seems all good. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article is stable. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:57, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broadness is all good. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:37, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For the part in the lede that says "some found the lyrics to lack meaningful depth.", please state who said that for neutrality. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:42, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While I haven't had a concern like this before, I clarified that it was some within the international media sphere that stated it. Let me know if you want it tweaked any further. Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 05:17, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decently large portions of the Söngvakeppnin 2025 section are too detailed. For example, the voting numbers from Söngvakeppnin 2025 are not needed, and would be better suited in the article Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2025. The other overly detailed portion is when it states the amount of points above second place. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:49, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I haven't had a concern like this before regarding any song I've gone through with a GAR that had a national final for its selection. I can understand the second concern you have, but the first? It just seems appropriate considering we can do the same for Eurovision results. See Eaea, Doomsday Blue, and Rockefeller Street for examples. Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 05:17, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It should mention that the song was released through Alda Music in the body's prose. It currently only says it in the lede, the infobox, and a table. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:50, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 05:17, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How did the music video accompany the release of the song if they came out weeks apart, 17 January 2025 and 6 February 2025? History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:54, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clarified. Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 05:17, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: Got around to your first round of concerns. Let me know if you have anything else. Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 05:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar check tomorrow. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:09, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"with an encouraging a message" -> "with an encouraging message"
"who consider themselves as religious Christians" -> who consider themselves Christians", Christians are religious by default, no?
"that song's lyrics tell the story" -> "that the song's lyrics tell the story"
"drawn to perform in fifth" -> "drawn to perform fifth"
"stated to Israeli newspaper Haaretz" -> "stated to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz"
"Væb were later drawn to perform in first" -> "Væb was later drawn to perform first"
"from the video game Minecraft and 2015 film Pixels." -> "from the video game Minecraft and the 2015 film Pixels." History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:12, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Done to all.
Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 03:21, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: Got through them all. Let me know if you need anything else! :) Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 03:55, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only issues Earwig found were quotes so that's fine. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:34, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spotcheck time:

I will review 8, 13, 28, 38, and 63. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

8 - fail - it does not say they heard the story in church, just that they go to church and also heard the story.
13 - fail - the source was released on 26 April, but the source never states if it happened that day, it never states the date again or says anything like today, or this morning.
28 - pass - it supports the statement.
38 - pass - it doesn't support the numbers but 39 does.
63 - pass - it supports the statement.
At the moment I can not pass the article due to these sourcing issues, I still will not be able to when the issues are fixed, this is because out of the sources I reviewed 2/5ths had errors, if the samples I took are representative of the full article, 33 sources have issues. After these issues are fixed, I will do another spotcheck to make sure that this isn't an anomaly, in the meantime, please make sure all your sources support the statement, @Nascar9919. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: For reference 8, I based the claim off the video linked in the article at the 6:17 mark. According to them, the story of the frogs was "like a story we were told from a church". As for ref 13, fixed with another source. Turns out it was a day earlier. Whoops. Cheers! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 18:31, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, one if one was my fault and one was just a minor mistake that was easily fixed I will be fine to pass the article, I am only on mobile so I don’t know how to run the GA bot, I will do it when I get home in a few hours. History6042😊 (Contact me) 18:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.