Talk:Pratt & Whitney GG4
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Requested move
[edit]Pratt & whitney GG4 → Pratt & Whitney GG4 — This new title is on the blacklist for some reason, not sure why. RadioFan (talk) 12:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'd suggest listing this under "uncontroversial proposals" (see here). Jafeluv (talk) 12:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support in conformity with the names of the other engines and the name of the company. What blacklist? --Bejnar (talk) 19:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Apparently, the creator chose this name since the corret one was unavailable. I tried to move it, but was not allowed because the title was on a blacklist, but it never stated what list or why. - BilCat (talk) 19:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Just a note I have managed to move it to the requested title. MilborneOne (talk) 20:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Requested move 22 April 2025
[edit]
 | It has been proposed in this section that Pratt & Whitney GG4 be renamed and moved to Pratt & Whitney FT4. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Pratt & Whitney GG4 → Pratt & Whitney FT4 – As the GG4 is the Pratt & Whitney J75 derived gas generator core of FT4 and therefore a component, the page should be renamed for the engine as a whole. The core has been reused in engines aside from the FT4, such as for the Peder Skram-class frigates of the Danish Navy, but these use cases appear to be a very small subset and therefore does not present any advantage in classification. LifeBeyondLiving (talk) 01:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)