Talk:People's Movement for the State

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the People's Movement for the State article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

People's Movement for the State has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 11, 2025	Good article nominee	Listed

This page is not a forum for general discussion about People's Movement for the State. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about People's Movement for the State at the Reference desk.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Passed. Kimikel (talk) 18:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:People's Movement for the State/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 20:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Kimikel (talk · contribs) 14:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will be reviewing this article as part of the January GAN drive. Please expect comments from me within the next few days. Kimikel (talk) 14:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vacant0: Sorry for the delay. There wasn't much to comment on, but my review is below. Please let me know if you have any comments or concerns regarding my suggestions. Thank you. Kimikel (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All

Done. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vacant0: I appreciate your expedient response. Everything's been addressed and I'm going to close this one out now. Thank you and congratulations. Kimikel (talk) 18:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written

Lead

supra-party > I'm not sure that the right page is wikilinked here

Never mind, I see what you're doing there. Perhaps big tent would be more appropriate? Kimikel (talk) 17:10, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

programme, despite > remove comma
NPZD has not released its programme, despite it being announced in June 2023. > I would recommend a qualifier like "As of January 2025,..." here.
have, however, reported > have reported
supportive and opposing of the movement > in support and opposition of the movement

History

SNS, while in 2017 > SNS, and in 2017,
revived the question about the formation of the NPZD in February 2024; he said that revived the discussion of the NPZD's formation in February 2024, saying that
said with its creation, > said that with its creation,

Ideology and platform

However, as of August 2023, the platform has not been published yet. > Remove however. Can this be updated, at least just to "as of January 2025"?
Political scientist Věra Stojarová > The political scientist Věra Stojarová (false title)

Organisation

movement, and that it would instead > movement and stated that it would instead

Illustrated

One image, properly licensed. If they ever get a logo or something like that, it would be nice to add it, but for now this is good.

Neutrality

Addresses both support and opposition of the movement evenly. No issues.

Broadness and stability

No issues.

Verifiability

39 is missing an (in Serbian) tag

Spot check

76: Verified
43: Verified
61: Verified
24: Verified
35: Verified

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.