Talk:Nigel (gannet)
Appearance
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Nigel (gannet) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in New Zealand may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | A fact from Nigel (gannet) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 February 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bunnypranav talk 13:13, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the "world's loneliest seabird" chose a concrete statue as his mate?
Moved to mainspace by Panamitsu (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 61 past nominations.
―Panamitsu (talk) 07:01, 11 January 2025 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
- ?
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: New enough (moved from draftspace on 11 January); Long enough (4388 characters); Sourced and neutral; No plagiarism concerns (Earwig - 2.9%); Hook is cited and interesting; QPQ has been provided. The article seems to be in good shape apart from a few presentability issues:
- The full form of DOC needs to be made known and wikilinked before using the abbreviation.
- "and would communicate with it" -> "and would try to communicate with it", surely he wasn't actually communicating with a concrete statue.
- "the island after DOC moved" -> "the island after the DOC moved" (same goes for every other mention of the DOC)
- We do not know what "Friends of Mana" is, it needs to be elaborated that it is a volunteer group.
- It'd be nice for readability if the second sentence of the "Background" section was split into two. AmateurHi$torian (talk) 11:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Panamitsu: I've made some minor edits to the page including adding author names to the citations; Seems good to go once the issues above get resolved. AmateurHi$torian (talk) 11:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @AmateurHi$torian: Thanks for the review and feedback. I've incorporated all these changes, except for the "the DOC" one. For some reason sources usually do not have the "the" before DOC, e.g. this one. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Good to go AmateurHi$torian (talk) 08:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- @AmateurHi$torian: Thanks for the review and feedback. I've incorporated all these changes, except for the "the DOC" one. For some reason sources usually do not have the "the" before DOC, e.g. this one. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)