Talk:Namco Museum DS/GA1
Appearance
GA review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 03:09, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 17:29, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
I remember playing this a lot when I was younger - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not home right now, so I won't be able to get to the comments for a while. I'll try to do it later tonight. λ NegativeMP1 20:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Cukie Gherkin: I've addressed all of the below comments, so you should be good to continue now. λ NegativeMP1 23:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Infobox
- Inconsistent use of Bandai Namco vs. Namco Bandai
- Fixed.
Lead
Images
- Caption should lose "as it is presented"
- Done.
Gameplay
- Should clarify that the games are single-player
- Weirdly enough I don't think any sources specifically says they were single player, but based on the fact Pac-Man VS. is the only game clarified to be multiplayer, I think it might be obvious?
- As I recall, there's vertical and horizontal modes? Might be good to specify (I found a source on that here [1])
- I though the "display settings" thing would make that clear, but done.
Release and reception
- [2] [3] [4] [5] Some dev and promo info
- Added many of these sources to the article.
- Verifies the existence of a dual pack game: [6]
- Added.
- Recommend making an "intro" sentence for the third paragraph
- Done.
- [7] [8] Included these non-English sources in case you want to add them down the line.
- Will add later on.
- Also found some other sources: [9] and [10], the latter of which can be used to verify the differences in the PMVS port and the author's feelings on it
- Added, although I didn't add his opinions directly to the reception, but rather as just a citation among the authors that liked the inclusion of Pac-Man Vs.
Spotcheck
Just have to do this. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- [11] Checked; looks good
- [12] Checked; looks solid
- [13] Checked; looks choice
- [14] Checked; looks tubular
Aight, passed. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)