Jump to content

Talk:Namco Museum DS/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 03:09, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 17:29, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I remember playing this a lot when I was younger - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not home right now, so I won't be able to get to the comments for a while. I'll try to do it later tonight. λ NegativeMP1 20:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cukie Gherkin: I've addressed all of the below comments, so you should be good to continue now. λ NegativeMP1 23:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

  1. Inconsistent use of Bandai Namco vs. Namco Bandai
    1. Fixed.

Lead

Images

  1. Caption should lose "as it is presented"
    1. Done.

Gameplay

  1. Should clarify that the games are single-player
    1. Weirdly enough I don't think any sources specifically says they were single player, but based on the fact Pac-Man VS. is the only game clarified to be multiplayer, I think it might be obvious?
  2. As I recall, there's vertical and horizontal modes? Might be good to specify (I found a source on that here [1])
    1. I though the "display settings" thing would make that clear, but done.

Release and reception

  1. [2] [3] [4] [5] Some dev and promo info
    1. Added many of these sources to the article.
  2. Verifies the existence of a dual pack game: [6]
    1. Added.
  3. Recommend making an "intro" sentence for the third paragraph
    1. Done.
  4. [7] [8] Included these non-English sources in case you want to add them down the line.
    1. Will add later on.
  5. Also found some other sources: [9] and [10], the latter of which can be used to verify the differences in the PMVS port and the author's feelings on it
    1. Added, although I didn't add his opinions directly to the reception, but rather as just a citation among the authors that liked the inclusion of Pac-Man Vs.

Spotcheck

Just have to do this. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  1. [11] Checked; looks good
  2. [12] Checked; looks solid
  3. [13] Checked; looks choice
  4. [14] Checked; looks tubular

Aight, passed. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]