Talk:Muhammad Iqbal Choudhary

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Muhammad Iqbal Choudhary article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Pakistan High‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.uop.edu.jo/En/Academics/FacultyofArtsandSciences/DepartmentofChemistry/Documents/AdjunctProfessorChemistry/Iqbal%20Choudhary%20CV.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sam Sailor 07:32, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible LLM generated text

I’ve tagged the article with {{AI-generated}}. I mainly suspect the _Associated Controversies_ section to to be generated by an LLM, though more text could be as well. I’m unsure partially because the article is at least 6 years old and relatively short, this section is a fair chunk of the total length.

At first glance the cited references seem to exist and have titles that match the ones used in the <ref> tags, apart from at least one (but it could have been changed by the website after it was added as a reference here, have not checked with the Wayback Machine yet).

I would like to hear what other Wikipedians think before before I go and remove large chunks of the article based on a sniff test alone (I found this article while patrolling Recent Changes, thinking that a large delete was potential vandalism). Gurkubondinn (talk) 23:24, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]