Talk:Minstrel Krampus
Appearance
![]() | Minstrel Krampus was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 27, 2025, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How does one add pop culture references made throughout the episode? Helpingimprovewiki (talk) 17:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Minstrel Krampus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Oddballeditor1997 (talk · contribs) 19:40, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 21:44, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Oddballeditor1997: reminder Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:23, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- Not to be confused with is completely unnecessary
Done
- Stray space after prod code
- (spoken voice) shouldnt be listed as this is an animated series it is presumed.
- Guest list does not have bullet points and which is inconsistant with other episodes.
- Image caption is unsourced
- Lead image needs alt text
- Last line is unsourced
Plot
[edit]- Too long, MOS:TVPLOT establishes a 400 word limit
Production
[edit]- First paragraph is not production detail and should be under broadcast
- Needs more information
Cultural References
[edit]- Section should be cut as its almost all WP:OR. The Beauty and the Beast part assuming its sourced properly can be moved to production
Reception
[edit]- Section is long walls of text that need to be broken down.
- The two paragrahs should be "Broadcast" and "Critical Reception" subheadings
- Over reliance on quotes
- Needs more reviews
References
[edit]- References are poorly formatted
- Bubbleblabber is not reliable
- What Culture is not reliable
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- B-Class Episode coverage articles
- Unknown-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- B-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- B-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Animated television articles
- Unknown-importance Animated television articles
- Animated television work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- B-Class Comedy articles
- Low-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles