Talk:Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (Netherlands)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 21 April 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (Netherlands) be renamed and moved to Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (Netherlands) → Ministry of Education, Culture and Science – No other ministry uses this name, the page is already a redirect, and it fits the convention of the other uniquely named Dutch ministry articles. Alexander vee (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr (lets chat) 23:02, 28 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. BD2412 T 03:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Science Policy, WikiProject Netherlands, and WikiProject Politics have been notified of this discussion. Valorrr (lets chat) 23:02, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Support - I see no objections Dajasj (talk) 05:07, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- Support as per WP:NCGAL, "Disambiguation is unnecessary if [...] the agency or office name is unique or is by far the most common meaning, the primary topic". Luxorr (talk) 16:07, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. The redirects Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (Mongolia) and Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (Iceland) strongly suggest that this name was also previously used in those countries (likely until quite recently looking at the edit histories). Latvia also seems to have had a ministry by this name. It is therefore ambiguous and a dabpage should be created. Note that we do not automatically assume that an organisation that currently bears a title is the primary topic for that title. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Very well put. Andrewa (talk) 09:45, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support move (as nominator) Others that aren’t in use should be added as a “for former ministries see:” at the top. Alexander vee (talk) 19:07, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: Final relisting to see if a consensus can be developed BD2412 T 03:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)