Talk:Madri/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Seyamar (talk · contribs) 21:54, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chilicave (talk · contribs) 00:10, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

Semi-protected from disruptive users. But stable for now.

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments

I'm in awe of the effort put into making this article what it is today. A few suggestions:

−Euphemisms like "love making", "perishing", "makes love" are avoided. Have a look at MOS:EUPHEMISM and replace them with words like "intimacy", "physical contact", "died"

I have changed most of them, but would like to know your suggestion on this line Despite Madri's repeated protests, Pandu makes love to her, forgetting the curse, which forbids him from intimate relations on penalty of death. Here instead of makes love, what can be used, because he did have sex with her but died before completion.Seyamar^💬📜

How about: "Despite Madri's repeated protests, Pandu initiates intimacy with her, forgetting the curse that forbids such relations on penalty of death"

Thanks,

done. Seyamar^💬📜 09:24, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

–The article is well-written, but I do feel that the word choice used is hard to digest at first glance. Here are some examples of where wording can be simplified:

A. Mādrī derives etymologically from Madra, designating the northwestern Indian subcontinental kingdom from which she hails.

Hails can changed to originates

DoneSeyamar^💬📜

B. In the textual skein running from 103.9 to 119.12, Kunti is allotted 195 verses, Gandhari 36 and Madri 85, not counting descriptions of their sons at birth.

In the section spanning from 103.9 to 119.2...

DoneSeyamar^💬📜

Spot checks

–This line "Madri's role in the Mahabharata is brief, but thematically significant" is interpretive. It is not stated in sources but inferred from the sources which is WP:OR. I would either find a source that states that. If not, then you should remove it.

It was based on Telidevara, would rephrase to be closer to original text:

Mahabharata...had many characters with less page space but more significance in terms of impact and story progression. Madri, the second wife of Pandu was one such character that had a very brief role in the narrative compared to her co-wife Kunti. Seyamar^💬📜 09:24, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

–Source 6 (Buitenen 1973) is not necessary since it's a translation of the Mahabharat itself. Not very applicable unless it states how Madri's entire life is mentioned in the Adi Parva.

–any citations for these lines? Madri appears in the Mahabharata, one of the Sanskrit epics originating from the Indian subcontinent, which primarily narrates about conflict between two groups of cousins—the Pandavas and the Kauravas. Composed in Classical Sanskrit, the text is a composite work shaped over centuries of revisions, editing, and interpolations.

Souce 1 [Brockington 1998, p. 25-26] covers the details of the Mbh (main topic, interpolations, dating), except for the line "Madri appears in", which is obvious.Seyamar^💬📜 09:24, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

—source 33 looks good

–source 42: good

–source 44: good

–Madri's role in the Mahabharata is brief, but thematically significant. Her entire life—from her introduction to her death—is recounted in the Adi Parva, the first of eighteen parvas or 'Books' of the Mahabharata.

This is the one line I was unsure about. It might be an exaggeration to say that her "entire life–from her introduction to her death–" is found in the Adi Parva. Although you may be right, the sources attached do not explicitly state that. You would be adding your own POV by writing it that way so I would suggest making it more neutral "Her life is recounted in the Adi Parva."

Done. Seyamar^💬📜

@Chilicave: any update? Seyamar^💬📜 03:21, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, just wanted to get a second opinion on something from the article. Jumping right back into it. Should be done with the review in a couple days.

Thanks Chilicave (talk) 05:05, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

-Images are either in the public domain or have a license compatible with WP.

-I also believe you overlooked my comment on Source 6? Have a look above and let me know if you are in agreement or not.

Oh, I already removed that as it was not necessary, forgot to reply to that.Seyamar^💬📜 15:07, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect then.

-I am unsure how this sentence Beyond the epic, Madri finds mentions in the Puranic genre of Hindu literature, such as the Bhagavata Purana, Matsya Purana and Vayu Purana, which attest mythological stories and genealogies.[12] correlates with the citation attached to it. Have a look and let me know.

Puranic index lists the Puranas in which Madri is specifically mentioned.Seyamar^💬📜 16:47, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, but when I go to the page number (651) I cannot find anything related to Madri on it. Perhaps the wrong page?

Oh, my bad, it is pg no. error, it should be p. 681, not 651.Seyamar^💬📜 12:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

-Source 67 looks like a blog, an unreliable source. If you look at WP:BLOGS, a possibility of keeping this source is if produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. Otherwise you'll have to remove it.

It is a blog, but the author is known for his works on Odiya language, see [1], [2].Seyamar^💬📜 16:47, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

alright, looks good Chilicave (talk) 21:05, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

just waiting on you to address the last question I had above and I'll be ready to wrap up the review! Thank you for your patience!

Thanks alot, Yes I have fixed the pg no. Just one query: The line —from her introduction to her death— can be inferred from Sorensen source, which list each and every verse location of her appearance. I think its appropriate to re add it.Seyamar^💬📜

Yes, I agree with you on that. I did ask for a second opinion on that and after giving much thought, it makes sense to re-add it. This article is officially a good article now. Congratulations.

Thank you so much :), I'm looking forward to more collaborations in future.Seyamar^💬📜 03:29, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]