This list is only for characters specifically identified as bisexual. Bisexual characters that are non-binary and/or transgender are also included. All characters must be supported with published reliable sources that confirm their specific identity. Please read "user-generated content" for sources that are not acceptable. Characters that do not have reliable sources cannot be included in the list.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2021.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride
Character(s) removed from list that need reliable sources
I noticed George Oscar “Gob” Bluth is on this list when his sexuality has been stated as gay a couple times by the creator, Mitch Hurwitz. Among those examples, there is a Deadline article in which Mitch Hurwitz says, “For us, the more interesting thing was giving Gob the gay storyline, because it’s usually the macho, overcompensating guy who turns out to be gay.” Another instance of this is in an entertainment weekly article: “Hint from Hurwitz: ‘He is on a bit of power trip, and he's in charge of the company... He's not the ladies' man he thought he was — and he might be in love with Tony Wonder.’” While not explicitly stated in this second quote, “he’s not the ladies’ man he thought he was” heavily implies it. And combined with the previous statement that says he is gay, it makes it pretty clear what he meant(he also on top of that uses the phrasing “gay panic”).
I didn't revert your removal, but I don't agree with it. When Hurwitz says "gay storyline", I believe he's saying "gay" as one component of being "bisexual". Prior to the Tony Wonder story arc (and after?), there's plenty of portrayal as him being sexually interested in women, too. My two cents. signed, Willondon (talk) 18:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see two problems: (1) you deleted a character that was supported with a reliable source (|title=GOB Bluth |url=https://bi.org/en/bi-characters/gob-bluth |website=Bi.org), and (2) your interpretation is based on vague wordage because neither one of your two selected sources specifically and unequivocally say that George Oscar “Gob” Bluth is gay. Pyxis Solitary(yak yak). Ol' homo.10:09, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm unsure why neither non-binary or transgender characters are included on this list. The hatnote says they're listed in other articles, but there's no reason they can't be listed here as well. If this list is to be accurate, it should list all notable characters, not only cisgender ones. Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 23:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why shouldn't nb (Q) and trans (T) characters be included in the lists that exist specifically for non-binary and transgender representation? What, then, is the point of having distinct lists for all the separate identities of the L-G-B-T-Q community? Pyxis Solitary(yak yak). Ol' homo.11:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I see the point of exclusion here as categorically, they're bisexual. They should be included in both lists as they aren't mutually exclusive identities. Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 12:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My position on it would be IF said characters have verifiable/reliable sources showing they are bisexual, fine, but otherwise, no. I think said characters should be listed in lists specifically for non-binary and trans characters and on this list, again, ONLY if there are reliable sources showing these characters are bisexual. That's a big sticking point with me because people tend to add characters onto pages (sadly, too often) like this but NOT provide sources, which is a pain to try and monitor and remove those characters who the user claims are bisexual, but then provides NO source(s). Also, my memory as to why trans and non-binary characters weren't included is that... there are very few of them with reliable/verifiable sources. I may be wrong, but that's my memory as to why that was done. The compromise was to have them be on their respective pages instead. If you would like to take on finding said characters and listing them here, that would be great.--Historyday01 (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Max Sweeney in The L Word (only cited on page 8 of GLAAD's report as "The female-to-male transgender character")
So, if we get down to it, only three of the characters listed above (Carlos Cervantes, Jim Jimenez, and Mo) could be added to this page, as they are the ONLY ones with reliable sources presently showing them to be bisexual. If the others could have reliable sources showing they are also bisexual, then a section could be more more justified.--Historyday01 (talk) 15:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you there. I am also tired of editors who only cite an episode as a source, but provide no published source, as it assumes that everyone has watched said episode and knows what happens. I do think these days that good writers do tend to describe specific identities of characters and even more, some who create series directly describe those entities. There also can be interviews with actors who talk about the identity of a character they play. I have, personally, tries to remove episode citations from articles I've edited, but sometimes those citations creep back in when I'm not looking. As for sources that only describe a character as queer, I can agree that is useless in a list like this. I do think it can have a place on pages like List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present. Maybe a list of queer characters could be good, except I think there would have to be guidelines to circumscribe its scope, as it could get far too large. Historyday01 (talk) 01:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is an example of a problem that has vexed these L, G, B, T (and now Q) lists for a long time. Characters with "sources" that say nothing about their specific identity are no different from characters that have no sources for them. Pyxis Solitary(yak yak). Ol' homo.09:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree with that and your edit there is a the right call. It is a tough job to try to root out the characters with bad sourcing. I've tried my part to do it, but I'm only one person and sometimes entries get past me. I've even thought of calling for a task force for pages with LGBTQ characters in animation, but never went through with that. Historyday01 (talk) 13:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]