Talk:Korean armed resistance in the Los Angeles riots

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[1992 Los Angeles riots#Riots and the Korean American community]] The anchor (#Riots and the Korean American community) has been deleted by other users before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Cleanup needed.

Seems a bit tendentious. I took out some stuff that was not backed up by the sources, and perhaps the other sources should be checked as well. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:15, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This article is a train wreck, and, is it really even necessary? Recommend deletion. Wuapinmon (talk) 20:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems large sections directly lifted from source material, with no regard for style guidelines. Deletion seconded! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.213.98 (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete this shit?

This whole article is sort of creepy--there is a weird agenda to it (VERY strongly pro-guns, not just pro-gun rights but pro-guns) and it seems as though the author is either trying to start a race war or assumes one already exists between blacks and Koreans (eg., that quotation about "if blacks are going to shoot us, we will shoot back"). 64.132.218.4 (talk) 15:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

As per the above discussion, this article should be deletec and the non-direct quoted contents of this article should be merged into 1992_Los_Angeles_riots#Riots_and_the_Korean-American_community. -Deathsythe (talk) 12:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps my removal of the prob was too hasty; I don't know. If there really is a problem with copyrighted material that cannot be fixed via editing, then perhaps an AFD discussion is in order? — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 13:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge This article on its own makes no sense. B-Machine (talk) 21:25, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Aside from being ignored and not benefiting from recentism, there's plenty of content in both articles, this article can be described through WP:SS, and the topics of both articles are precise enough to stand on their own. tedder (talk) 01:41, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect, although my preference would be to take this to Afd where I would recommend merge and delete. Wikipedia would be better served with the content placed in the parent article, and the "armed resistance" title is just plain weird. Location (talk) 21:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done I was bold and merged the relevant information and references. -Deathsythe (talk) 18:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]