Jump to content

Talk:January 2025 Southern California wildfires

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Turn off auto archiving

[edit]

As activity regarding this topic has decreased the auto archiving for this talk page is no longer necessary. 2603:8000:1801:65F1:D9AB:A359:6E6:3061 (talk) 06:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge harrz talk 17:14, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articles for the Border 2, Hughes and Hurst fires should be merged into this article. None of those fires had any lasting impact with no casualties or property damage. They only recieved coverage at the time due to the scale of the other ongoing fires. When I proposed merging the Hurst fire to this article here at the time it was refused, with many editors saying to wait and see if there was lasting coverage. Well, it's been almost two months and no mention of any of these 3 fires since. harrz talk 18:50, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all three per nom. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:43, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I support, I haven't heard anything about these fires ever since they got contained. Only Palisades and Eaton Fires seem to have the most recognition. StormHunterBryante5467 (talk) 11:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support WereWolf (talk) 19:05, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I support besides Hughes. I think Hughes is still noteworthy due to all the evacuations WatchOutBroo (talk) 07:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support for all three. None of these fires are really notable now, and they only received media attention while they were burning. Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 02:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.