Jump to content

Talk:Invasion of Gozo (1551)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Invasion of Gozo (1551)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Xwejnusgozo (talk · contribs) 21:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pichemist (talk · contribs) 06:44, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article presents a clear, chronological narrative with proper grammar and spelling. It follows Wikipedia's standard layout with sections such as Background, Attack, and Aftermath, and uses accessible language. This aligns with GA requirements for clarity and style. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 06:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with No Original Research
The article includes inline citations and references to support its claims, as required for verifiability and to avoid original research. All significant facts, figures, and quotations are sourced, which is essential for GA status.
3. Broad in Coverage
The article addresses the main aspects of the invasion:
Historical context and causes
Details of the attack and siege
Aftermath and consequences for Gozo and Malta
It avoids undue detail or trivia, staying focused on the central topic, which meets the "broad in coverage" criterion.
4. Neutral
The article presents information factually and avoids editorializing, giving weight to the perspectives of both the defenders and the Ottoman attackers. There is no overt bias detected in the summary or the narrative.
5. Stable
There is no indication of ongoing edit wars or major recent changes. Stability is a prerequisite for GA status.
6. Illustrated
The article includes at least one relevant image (the northern walls of the Gozo Castello), which is properly captioned and relevant to the topic. This satisfies the illustration criterion. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 06:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


The article appears to meet the core requirements for Good Article status on English Wikipedia. However, a final determination would require a detailed review of the full article.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.