Talk:Invasion of Gozo (1551)
Appearance
![]() | Invasion of Gozo (1551) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 22, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Invasion of Gozo (1551)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Xwejnusgozo (talk · contribs) 21:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pichemist (talk · contribs) 06:44, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- The article presents a clear, chronological narrative with proper grammar and spelling. It follows Wikipedia's standard layout with sections such as Background, Attack, and Aftermath, and uses accessible language. This aligns with GA requirements for clarity and style. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 06:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2. Verifiable with No Original Research
- The article includes inline citations and references to support its claims, as required for verifiability and to avoid original research. All significant facts, figures, and quotations are sourced, which is essential for GA status.
- 3. Broad in Coverage
- The article addresses the main aspects of the invasion:
- Historical context and causes
- Details of the attack and siege
- Aftermath and consequences for Gozo and Malta
- It avoids undue detail or trivia, staying focused on the central topic, which meets the "broad in coverage" criterion.
- 4. Neutral
- The article presents information factually and avoids editorializing, giving weight to the perspectives of both the defenders and the Ottoman attackers. There is no overt bias detected in the summary or the narrative.
- 5. Stable
- There is no indication of ongoing edit wars or major recent changes. Stability is a prerequisite for GA status.
- 6. Illustrated
- The article includes at least one relevant image (the northern walls of the Gozo Castello), which is properly captioned and relevant to the topic. This satisfies the illustration criterion. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 06:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
The article appears to meet the core requirements for Good Article status on English Wikipedia. However, a final determination would require a detailed review of the full article.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class Ottoman military history articles
- Ottoman military history task force articles
- GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Malta articles
- High-importance Malta articles
- WikiProject Malta articles