Talk:Inside Out 2

Anxiety (Inside Out) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 November 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Inside Out 2. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Inside Out 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Animation: American / Films / Computer / Pixar Top‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pixar work group (assessed as Top-importance).

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disney High‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Top-importance).
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as High-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 5 times. The weeks in which this happened:

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Add in the ign article of the bad working conditions just like with across the SpiderVerse

It needs to be in the production section https://www.ign.com/articles/inside-out-2-was-the-hit-pixar-needed-but-the-laid-off-employees-who-crunched-on-it-are-still-hurting 205.172.121.203 (talk) 22:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be interesting to add that to the article, although I think it would be better to put it in the "production" section. And this interview talks a bit about how the film was made, so I'll ask user @EJS524: to see if I can put it in the article. 2801:1CA:E:1411:62C:D6C:9D57:C071 (talk) 18:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anything yet 205.172.121.203 (talk) 17:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

did he say anything yet 2605:B100:506:AAF4:8C63:7617:42D5:BBF3 (talk) 20:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any update? RockMan77777 (talk) 11:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this is a problem for the animation industry that got laid off at pixar 207.134.58.90 (talk) 13:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

idk 76.68.150.45 (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Answer me right now 76.68.150.45 (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Add source to complement the "Production" section

Hi, I'm here to ask if anyone can add the following source: [1] to the "Production" section. It talks about how the directors came up with the film based on their childhood experiences and it would be interesting to include this in the article. So I invite users @Mushy Yank: and @Yovt: to see what they think about the source. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it might be a good idea. Again, I suggest you create an account so that you can edit the page in the future, including that addition for example. Best, -Mushy Yank. 18:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This source is reliable and can certainty improve the production section. I do concur with Mushy Yank that you are encouraged to create an account. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 19:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yovt: I'm a bit busy at the moment and won't be able to dedicate much time to Wikipedia, so I ask you to add the information to complement the article and then I'll register. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 20:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[2] Done

. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 21:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what about this https://www.ign.com/articles/inside-out-2-was-the-hit-pixar-needed-but-the-laid-off-employees-who-crunched-on-it-are-still-hurting 76.68.150.45 (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone add in the allegations of poor working conditions from the ign article

This is similar to across the SpiderVerse but this time it’s the animators were given crunch time and were laid off during production of inside out 2 and there were edits to make Riley less gay. 69.159.140.126 (talk) 22:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is no one answering me 2605:B100:533:5933:1877:337E:1F67:3525 (talk) 16:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you have reliable sources to back this up? 135.180.161.67 (talk) 00:15, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i have these two https://www.cartoonbrew.com/artist-rights/report-inside-out-2-artists-had-to-crunch-seven-days-a-week-for-months-to-finish-film-242974.html and https://www.ign.com/articles/inside-out-2-was-the-hit-pixar-needed-but-the-laid-off-employees-who-crunched-on-it-are-still-hurting and name it to allegations of terrible working conditions just like with the production of across the spiderverse 76.68.150.45 (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See 2605:B100:513:5188:95C1:7D33:DB46:7F08 (talk) 22:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a good idea to add that information to the article. I think it could fit in the "Animation" section since it talks about animators and how they were exploited. So I'll ask user @Yovt: to add that information and complement the section further. 191.156.245.210 (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But no one has put it in similar to across the SpiderVerse titled “allegations of poor working conditions” 207.96.240.194 (talk) 14:37, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plz do it now 76.68.150.45 (talk) 22:43, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, it would be best to call @Yovt: to see if they can add the sources to a possible "Controversies" section or something similar. 181.78.209.203 (talk) 21:12, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IP editor, thanks for reaching out. Luckily, I seem to have some time on my hands for the next week and will certainly look into potential controversies of Inside Out 2; see the relevant MOS:FILMCONTROVERSIES guideline if you wish to look into it as well. I thank you for making me your go-to for help, and I encourage you to create an account. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 23:15, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Create an article just for the nominations

Hi, I came here to ask if we can create a separate article for the “Accolades” section, as I have seen a lot of nominations, which makes the article unnecessarily long. I see that the film was nominated for the Oscars, BAFTA, Golden Globes, Annies, etc. It would be nice to create a separate article for the nominations, just like what happened with Inside Out and Toy Story 4. That is why I am calling on users @Chompy Ace:, @Yovt:, @Movieknower59:, among others, to see what they think of the idea. 191.156.244.131 (talk) 18:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems I haven't received any response from users, not even a reply to this. That's why I'm calling out users @Chompy Ace:, @Yovt: and @Movieknower59: again to see what they think about this. 191.95.49.242 (talk) 18:25, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IP user, I may respond. If you are truly dedicated to making an accolades article, I would encourage you to cook up a draft at Draft:List of accolades received by Inside Out 2. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 18:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just been counting on how many notifications Inside Out 2 has. Then I compared with Toy Story 4, which is close enough of nominations it has. So maybe it should have it own page of nominations for Inside Out 2. Movieknower59 (talk) 18:33, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Movieknower59: So how about you create the page since you have knowledge in movie nominations? If you accept and do it, I would really appreciate it. 181.78.209.203 (talk) 18:13, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Movieknower59: and @Chompy Ace: I'd like to know if you could compile a list of the film's awards and nominations. The number of nominees is almost the same as Toy Story 4. So I wish you the best of luck if you want to create one. 191.106.13.24 (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]