Talk:Ibrahim Adil Shah II hawking

Did you know nomination

(

)

Ibrahim Adil Shah II hawking

... that an inscription on the painting Ibrahim Adil Shah II hawking (pictured) identifies its subject as an emperor, even though he was not?

Source: Goswamy, B. N. (2016). The Spirit of Indian Painting - Close Encounters With 101 Great Works 1100-1900. It reads:tasveer-ikhaqan-i'azam ibrahim adilshah —'Portrait of the great khaqan, Ibrahim Adil Shah'. The title khaqan was traditionally reserved for the emperor of China or the rulers of Chinese Tartary (the Islamic khanates in western China), but also applied later, loosely, to any emperor. Ibrahim Adil Shah was neither the emperor of China nor any emperor, for the Sultans of the Deccani kingdoms were not entitled to that status due to the overpowering presence of the Mughals in the north.

Created by AmateurHi$torian (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 22 past nominations.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: ~~QPQ still required, otherwise~~ good to go; AGF on the hook citation beautiful, thank you, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 20:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC) Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 02:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't work out how to add a grey AGF tick above, but here's one:

@Maculosae tegmine lyncis: You need to add |hookcited = AGF instead of |hookcited = y in the template :) -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]