Talk:IEC 60906-1
Appearance
![]() | This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Paraguay
[edit]According to several news articles (and the INTN itself) I found and translated, Paraguay might be on the path to introducing IEC 60906-1.
The national version/translation of the standard has been developed by the government's institute for technology [1] INTN.
I have to say, my Spanish is not good enough to understand whether the standard is really on it's way or whether this is just a vague annoucement. Maybe a Spanish speaking native can shed light onto the matter?
Sources:
https://www.lanacion.com.py/tendencias/2022/11/17/anuncian-cambios-en-fichas-y-tomacorrientes/
-- Xolani (talk) 20:01, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed it seems that that new standard is in force, though compliance is voluntary so far, so the new sockets will probably spread slowly. I'll update the article accordingly! Gawaon (talk) 17:28, 24 March 2025 (UTC)