Talk:Gaehwa Party

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Enlightenment faction

Surely this page should be called the "Enlightenment faction". It was not a political party in any modern sense. MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also bugged by the article title. It'd be hard to prove WP:COMMONNAME because of name overlap, but I think WP:USEENGLISH may also apply. Whether or not it was truly a political party may not matter depending on what the common name is; if scholars call it a party (I don't think they do though), then we call it one. toobigtokale (talk) 08:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 March 2025

It has been proposed in this section that Gaehwa Party be renamed and moved to Enlightenment Party.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Gaehwa Party → Enlightenment Party – WP:COMMONNAME. Regardless "Gaehwa" is likely inappropriate, as it uses Revised Romanization.

Not much on ngrams, but these major scholarly works use "Enlightenment Party":