Talk:Fran Folnegović/GA1

GA Review

Passed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 00:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 20:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing this for GARC. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042, just pinging you in case this slipped your mind. No particular rush otherwise. Cheers Tomobe03 (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry I completely forgot about this. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:52, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Discussion

The images are all public domain and have captions do the article passes criteria 6. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There hasn't been any edit warring. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:13, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems to cover all major aspects and is focused. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article seems neutral enough and Earwig found no copyright violations. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:55, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Found no MOS violations or major grammatical issues. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a reference section. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, I can pass this. Sorry about the wait, I completely forgot. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spotcheck

Time for a spotcheck. I checked sources 14, 16, and 6. They all were correct so this spotcheck passes. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.