Talk:Frailty (Jane Remover album)

Frailty (Jane Remover album) is currently an Albums good article nominee. Nominated by Locust member (talk) at 16:13, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Short description: 2021 studio album by Jane Remover

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Artist name

Please note that all the sources we have refer to the name of the artist, at least at the time of release of the album, as Dltzk. A name change must be backed up by a source stating that they have changed names, since they are known to have multiple projects under different names. —C.Fred (talk) 14:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article from Pitchfork mentions this name change (as well as this article's subject, Frailty). This other article from The Fader also does this. Two twice^talk 01:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Twotwice But the album was released under their previous name (this is stated in the pitchfork) article. It makes sense to mention the name change but I don't think we should change every instance of "dltzk" to "Jane Remover". — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 01:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

could we not just change some of them to just "jane" then? they've completely killed off the "dltzk" name, and are even releasing a new version of their EP teen week under the name jane remover after they make a couple changes. their whole spotify has changed as well. they've unlisted teen week on their bandcamp, however frailty has moved to the name "jane remover". the songs for teen week on their soundcloud account have been specifically tagged as "dltzk - Teen Week" however frailty has not had such a change. hope that helps. Saintfuki (talk) 16:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added a line explaining the change in the lead, and an explanatory note. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 16:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dltzk references their deadname, so I think it should be changed. the status that Saintfuki linked kinda speaks for itself—we should honor the artist's wishes here. I reworded the explanatory note & replaced all the references to just "Jane". I don't know how to change the article's title beyond moving it (since the "(Jane Remover album)" page just links back to the "(Dltzk album)" page), but I think that should be done too. Twizzlestorm (talk) 01:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't a deadname. Their birth name was never "dltzk". It's just a pseudonym they no longer use. The Fader article puts it clearly: dltzk has officially changed their stage name to Jane Remover. I'm fine with changing mentions of "dltzk" in the prose to "remover" but I disagree with the article title being changed when the album was originally released under "dltzk", and is more notable being released under that name. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 01:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Critical acclaim"

@PerfectSoundWhatever: Since when is "critical acclaim" a "super common" word that can be attributed to three review sentences? None of them verify or include the statement. Not even a Metascore ("universal acclaim") to back up that claim, just your personal preference. ภץאคгöร 06:39, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I still disagree, but I think what I changed it to is a good compromise. (it's also just a more precise summary sentence) — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 19:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Frailty (Jane Remover album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 16:13, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 17:45, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. This album is very special. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 17:45, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much; this is my favorite album of all time so I am happy to finally expand the article and am more than happy you are reviewing it :) Locust member (talk) 18:42, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Locust member: sorry for the wait. I have all of tonight and the weekend to finish this review and will ping once done. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 02:00, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good, no rush!! Locust member (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]