Talk:Felipe Ángeles International Airport

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Felipe Ángeles International Airport article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Mexico Mid‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 17 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Santa Lucía Airport. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Requested move 17 August 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 23:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– Less confusing and concise names. They are not located in Mexico City. The proposed names are not new for the sources either [1][2] Santa Lucía's might be moved eventually to Santa Lucía International Airport if it ever manages to gain that level. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – I'm undecided, will try to do some reading. At first glance it looks reasonable. I did find a style guide that seems applicable, although it's described as a "draft" and doesn't really suggest that either name is better than the other. Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Naming (Airports). GA-RT-22 (talk) 00:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose they are located near Mexico City, they need not be within the metropolitan borders. The English sources all refer to Texcoco as (potentially) "Mexico City's new airport". If Santa Lucía is built out, there will surely be a common name in the future; for now we should stick to the more descriptive name. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 00:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@力: Texcoco was canceled and it is planned to become a public park. Santa Lucía's already exists as a military airbase. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Mexico has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Aviation has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support, more concise and natural.TotallyAbrupt (talk) 05:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per power~enwiki. More recognizable with the city included, and there doesn't seem to be a clear common name. — Amakuru (talk) 13:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.