Talk:Revolution of Dignity
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Revolution of Dignity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Revolution of Dignity, along with other pages relating to the Russo-Ukrainian War, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on February 19, 2014, and February 23, 2014. |
![]() | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 18, 2024, and February 18, 2025. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Not A, not even B
[edit]@Closed Limelike Curves: Please stop edit warring. For academic sources that cover this not-so-current event, see my comment at Talk:Revolution_of_Dignity/Archive_10#Arbitrary_break. Also: An "A" rating normally needs a review, see the pages on rating. Rsk6400 (talk) 05:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Rsk6400 Edit warring? I am not seeing it. Can you please provide diffs? The editor hasn't even edited the article at all.[1]. --David Tornheim (talk) 14:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I was addressing Closed Limelike Curves and I think they know that they were edit warring on this talk page. Rsk6400 (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oh right. Now I see. [2][3]. I suggest when you accuse others of edit-warring that you provide the diffs, so it's clear. I didn't understand the title about A or B. It's so rare to see edit-warring on the talk page. I had seen the this change and was going to revert myself, except that I am not sufficiently familiar with the process of how articles are assessed. I am glad you had reverted it. Sorry for any confusion.--David Tornheim (talk) 18:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I was addressing Closed Limelike Curves and I think they know that they were edit warring on this talk page. Rsk6400 (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- @David Tornheim feel free to nominate this for GA status, then, so I can give it an A-class rating when it's approved. :) Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 02:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Under “Aftermath”\“Protests against the revolution”
[edit]In the last paragraph there may be a confusion between people and the parliament and the reference is wrong or non-existent; I would had deleted that last sentence of the last paragraph Taltzgcz (talk) 10:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
"Revolution of Dignity" who coined the name, and when did it come into usage?
[edit]Who coined the term "Revolution of Dignity", and when did it come into usage? Why is the word "dignity" in the name, and how does that relate to the events in Ukraine? There is no mention of this in this entire padlocked article. Could a Wikipedia power user please add some information about where the name "Revolution of Dignity" came from?120.88.155.223 (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC) 120.88.155.223 (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Just the heading tells me all I need to know about this article and Wikipedia in general. "The Ukraine revolution (2014)" is the obvious and only title that this article should have. It is clear, descriptive and unbiased. This kind of BS is why Wikipedia is going the same way as the large corporate propaganda outlets. It was once a useful resource; it is now is pure political propaganda. 206.83.119.213 (talk) 00:06, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! I'm not educated on this topic but consensus was made here [4] (under sections "Title change" and "Requested move 16 November 2021"). If you believe that "this article and Wikipedia in general" are biased, feel free to contribute. You can request the article name to be changed if your reasoning is valid and verifiable by reliable secondary sources. Cheers, xRozuRozu (t • c) 05:32, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's called Revolution of Dignity because Ukrainian State propaganda wants it to be called like that. See first three links in the Ukrainian Wikipedia. (1)
- 1 https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Революція_гідності
- The Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies (2) at University of Alberta & University of Toronto, who maintains the Internet Encyclopedia of Ukraine, calls it Euromaidan Revolution. (3)
- 2 https://www.ualberta.ca/en/canadian-institute-of-ukrainian-studies/index.html
- 3 https://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CE%5CU%5CEuromaidanRevolution.htm 2003:C1:CF3B:4B01:1C0F:2195:D819:BE22 (talk) 03:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- The source you linked also calls it the Revolution of Dignity. This Wikipedia article also calls it the Maidan Revolution, a part of the Euromaidan protests. x RozuRozu • teacups 06:29, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Biased Article
[edit]This article is clearly biased in favor of the U.S., EU, and NATO, and opposed to Russia. It highlights the Russian actions, both overt and convert, but fails to mention the actions of the U.S., EU, and NATO, either overt or covert. JWRose001 (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @JWRose001: Hello! You may suggest contributions to this article by making an edit request. Be sure to include reliable sources. Cheers! x RozuRozu • teacups 06:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, the reliable sources do not publish the truth. Hope this helps! 2A00:23CC:B589:EF01:A821:6F8F:7B54:24 (talk) 18:36, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, read WP:NOTRIGHT. If you have any reliable sources that support "the truth", you may add it as long as it passes WP:FRNG.
- You do make a good point. However, if you would like to change Wikipedia's policies, this article talk page is not the place. Hope this helps! x RozuRozu • teacups 06:40, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- @XRozuRozu: Please deny recognition, WP:DENY. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:42, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, the reliable sources do not publish the truth. Hope this helps! 2A00:23CC:B589:EF01:A821:6F8F:7B54:24 (talk) 18:36, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Im Not Sure What part of this article is biased towards US, Eu , Nato and oposed to Russia overt and covert since to me the article shows the oposite in other words skewed in favor of Pro Russian narritives/perpectives . The article mentions Russia had pressured Ukraine to reject Eu intigration. But there are no documreentstion provided for this claim that the ukranian parliment actually voted a stop to the european intrigitation or instead voted in favor of Russian trade deal. If the president of Ukraine did the deal soley himself and stopped the intrgrration it seams to me this is uconstitunal according to Ukranian laws at the time and a form of coup since the head of state (ruling President) probably didnt have that much extensive power. This is however pure specualation since no documentation to the claim stated in the article is provided.. 2A01:563:36A:8B00:BD9C:4928:E816:E890 (talk) 22:32, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Change request to Overview section
[edit]Towards the end of the section, I request that "the evening" be changed to "that evening", as this is more consistent with English as it's usually spoken. Thanks. NESMRTNOST (talk) 13:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles under general sanctions
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- C-Class Ukraine articles
- Top-importance Ukraine articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles
- C-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class European history articles
- Top-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- C-Class 2010s articles
- Top-importance 2010s articles
- WikiProject 2010s articles