Talk:Family Guy season 9

Television: Episode coverage Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Animation: American / Television / Family Guy Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Family Guy work group (assessed as Top-importance).

Comedy Mid‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Family Guy season 9 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Template order

User:79.228.211.155 has continually attempted to revert the template, despite the fact the template that I have continually tried to implement matches every other season's list. Please explain why you continue to revert the article, despite this. Gage (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The IPs edits make no sense. CTJF83 11:48, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The EpisodeNumber/2 are backwards, and it seems this is what that IP address was trying to rectify (on 2 edits I reviewed, at least). See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Episode_list for the explanation of each. 12 other TV shows that I monitor all follow this order for all seasons. Would it not be better to follow the same, agreed, format? Or, at least follow the format in that template and discuss issues you have with the EpisodeNumber/2 ordering on that template's talk page? Cgarvey (talk) 10:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I should add, that I'm not concerned about the order of those 2 columns, just that they use the inconsistent use of EpisodeNumber/2, thus breaking parsers. All other TV shows I monitor (mainly prime-time current shows) interpret EpisodeNumber as the overall series number (a series having many seasons), and EpisodeNumber2 being the number within that particular season. That interpretation seems to be inline with the template's description. Cgarvey (talk) 10:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brothers & Sisters (Family Guy)

This page is basically entirely plot summary. The two cultural references are unsourced and might not be true. It needs to be expanded or it should be redirected to here. JDDJS (talk) 20:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it should be expanded then. So don't redirect it, again.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one who feel it deserves it's own page, not me. So it is not my job to expand it. I suggest you use a sandbox to find sources so you can make reception and production sections. If you do that, then you can recreate it. JDDJS (talk) 21:40, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]