Talk:Erma (webtoon)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Concerns regarding neutrality, sourcing, and potential conflict of interest
[edit]I'm adding the following maintenance tags to the article:
COI: The article appears to have been written by someone with a conflict of interest, potentially the creator or someone affiliated with the webtoon. There's notably promotional language, particularly when comparing Erma to Calvin and Hobbes without providing proper context or alternative viewpoints.
advert: Several passages use promotional language rather than encyclopedic tone, especially phrases like "on par with, if not superior to, Calvin and Hobbes." This type of evaluative language is inappropriate for Wikipedia articles.
refimprove: The article lacks sufficient independent, reliable sources. Many references appear to be primary or self-published sources, which cannot adequately verify claims about plot, reception, or significance.
notability: Current sourcing doesn't clearly establish whether Erma meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. While the webtoon has a following, the article needs substantial coverage from independent, notable publications to warrant inclusion.
POV: The article presents a predominantly positive view of the series without balanced perspectives, which contravenes Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy. I suggest revising the article to use more neutral language, incorporate independent reliable sources, and ensure content adheres to Wikipedia's standards. 156.57.113.80 (talk) 14:17, 16 March 2025 (UTC)