Talk:Elizabeth Teeter

Elizabeth Teeter has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 3, 2025. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Musical Theatre

Elizabeth Teeter is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

A fact from Elizabeth Teeter appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 February 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Elizabeth Teeter was originally cast as Lydia Deetz in Broadway's Beetlejuice in 2020, but did not get to play the role until 2022?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2025/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth Teeter.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 23:36, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Elizabeth Teeter was originally cast as Lydia Deetz in Broadway's Beetlejuice in 2020 but didn't get to play the role until 2022?

Source: [1][2]

ALT1: ... that Elizabeth Teeter only got to attend three days of rehearsal for her lead role in Broadway's Beetlejuice before theatres shut down due to the COVID-19 pandemic? Source: [3]
ALT2: ... that Elizabeth Teeter played young Elizabeth II and Elizabeth Parris on Broadway? Source: [4][5]
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ai sponge

Created by Pamzeis (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 46 past nominations.

Pamzeis (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Wow, quite a promising career — glad to have an article on her! New enough at time of nomination; very thoroughly sourced. ALT0 and ALT1 are definitely more interesting. I would lean toward the original hook since it's more succinct and also probably more intriguing. Might be nice to link to Beetlejuice when promoted. Spaghettifier talk 03:21, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:38, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Elizabeth Teeter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Pamzeis (talk · contribs) 12:23, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 06:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I will be reviewing this GA! :) This article looks really good and promising, and clearly a lot of work and research has gone into it - well done!! :)

I have just a few suggestions that I had:

1.) I would highly recommend sourcing each sentence in the "Life and career" section, as it is a BLP and the statements are not exactly controversial but it is important to be verifiable.

Not done as per WP:CONSECUTIVECITE; I'm kinda iffy with repeating refs more than necessary because it kinda clutters the article IMO. I think the rule of thumb her is every paragraph needs to have a citation at the end.

2.) "She left high school as a result and completed her schoolwork at the beginning and end of rehearsals" - Can this be clarified/expanded upon slightly, if there is further information on it? Was she homeschooled, did she attend virtual classes, did she pass etc? If there is not enough information then it is not the end of the world. Also, would changing the wording to "before and after rehearsals" be better, as the former could suggest that she would study during rehearsals.

Done; I've added what I can

3.) Is there any post 2023 information? I found this source [6] which I believe could be added?

There is I suppose, but she has not been part of anything significant post-2023. Most of these are WP:ROUTINE coverage of regional performances, which makes them WP:UNDUE IMO.

4.) Is this source of any use? [7] It is not a requirement, I just thought it could help the article's expansion.

Added

5.) Per MOS:ALLCAPS, the sources which have "PHOTO CALL" in their title should be simply "Photo call".

6.) Is there anymore information/reception that could potentially be added to further develop the article? If not, that is okay, I just wanted to see.

I don't think so. I've tried to find reception for The Crucible and Beetlejuice, but couldn't find anything.

7.) I used the IABot to archive 22 of the sources and have manually archived another one - if you could archive the remaining 2 (Refs 2 and 14) that would be amazing!

I have checked on earwig and there are no copyright issues and there are no problems from what I can see, so if the points above are addressed/replied to I will do a source check and then pass the article :) Well done!! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pamzeis: I have now done #5 and #7, so if you could just address the remaining points that would be great :) Please no rush, I am happy to wait a few more days (or longer if needed) :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 08:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Thanks for the review. I believe I've responded to all of your concerns. Apologies for the delay; I didn't see this initially, and I've been a bit busy lately. Pamzeis (talk) 02:28, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, no worries at all! Thank you so much for the changes, they have made the article look even better and have clarified things :) I just archived the remaining source and I added a ref to the end of a quote as all quotes need inline sources before the MOS. If you could add a sentence or two about the reception that she received to the lead, that would be great. However, in the meantime I am going to pass this. Well done!! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:37, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.