Talk:ELP Communications

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should the lost T.A.T rising star logo get its own section?

I feel like this doesn't need to be in the history section and it should be split into its own category. RaiaxUwUX3 (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Without sources, it doesn't belong in the article at all. --Onorem (talk) 22:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is on AVID though. Here: https://www.avid.wiki/T.A.T._Communications_Company Chiagozie Elobuike (talk) 23:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The AVID is a wiki. Wikis are user-generated sources and are therefore not reliable and should not be used. AKK700 05:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Chiagozie Elobuike (talk) 14:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "rising star" logo never existed, and if you're talking about the found one, then yeah. the only thing mentioning the finding is the word "infamous" as a part of the caption on the vanity card from what I know. 2601:401:8200:ED4:0:0:0:B5 (talk) 18:49, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and the found one is called the "Cheesy Star" from what I know. 2601:401:8200:ED4:0:0:0:B5 (talk) 18:49, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't the TAT logo get its own section?

It's really popular in other communities so I think it should get its own section on this page. Besides, it already got mentioned two times. Chiagozie Elobuike (CKE Channel) (talk) 03:57, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finding section.

I think that there should be more about the finding other then an implication of infamy (it was notoriously hard to find, the search lasted 20 years), like Bored's finding, the partial logo plaster from 2018, etc. 2601:401:8200:ED4:0:0:0:B5 (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]