Talk:Durham rule
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Undated comment
[edit]Don't really have time to edit, but I disagree with this assertion. "Expert witnesses are used in trials for the sole purpose of providing facts, not provide opinions." Expert witnesses are called in medical malpractice trials to give their opinion based on their learning and experiences. The expert qualification entitles the witness to give opinions; fact witnesses (all others) are limited to testifying as to facts.
Wiki Education assignment: Fire Semester 2
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 January 2025 and 13 May 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Washingtonpink, Camcam224, Terps10, StarryExplorer92 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Musicdog1220 (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Crime-related articles
- Mid-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class psychology articles
- Mid-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- Stub-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles