Jump to content

Talk:Dušan Knežević (war criminal)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Dušan Knežević (war criminal)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 10:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: PARAKANYAA (talk · contribs) 01:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First and foremost I have a major concern. Almost all of this article is cited to legal proceedings/trial judgements, which per WP:BLPPRIMARY we are not supposed to use on BLPs ever. Quote: "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person." It's less a BLPcrime issue as he was soundly convicted but we simply cannot use legal notices on BLPs. Do you have any reason for going against this? Because as it is probably all of this article should be deleted (unless there is some difference when it comes to extremely high level crimes like war crimes, which I am not opposed to, but AFAIK there is no carveout for this). PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This goes for your other two recently nominated GANs too. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
G’day PARAKANYAA. Sorry, tyro mistake, first time I’ve ever written articles on recent war criminals. I do think the total ban on using documents from legal proceedings is counter-intuitive, especially when the matters have been completely dealt with, appeals and all, and in several cases, the person has been released from custody. I’m not seeing what the unfairness to the living person is that the policy wonks are trying to avoid by banning it. IMHO the ban should be limited to using findings of fact in legal proceedings that are incomplete, as that is unfair, and could be overturned on appeal. I’ll pursue that at the village pump later. However, in this and the other war criminal bio articles, everything in the article can be sourced to reliable secondary sources on the work of the ICTY, the wars, law journals/reports, etc. I’ve started on that, it’ll take a few days to complete. I’ll ping you when it’s done. Thanks for picking this up. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:50, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah a village pump discussion is a good idea. Ping me there if you do, I tend to agree with you (but others may not). PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:50, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]