Talk:Dream Productions

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Animation: Television / Pixar Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group.
	This article is supported by the Pixar work group (assessed as Top-importance).

Television: American Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American television task force.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Riley's Age

Riley's bio (copied from Inside Out 2) states her to be 13 years old. While Riley indeed is 13 in said movie, this show takes place a year before the movie. That being said, Riley should be stated as 12 years old, not 13. To further prove my point, in this show, Riley can be shown wearing her hair down (like she did in the first movie) and as seen in Inside Out 2, Riley is 13 when she starts wearing her hair in a ponytail. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:B000:A639:964:4B79 (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit has been made, thank you for pointing this out. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 19:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. 👌🏻 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:F59F:53A3:6AAD:2B2C (talk) 02:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Productions poster

Has everyone who update the new official poster in this page? TheMultiverseStudios (talk) 03:26, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Walt Disney Animation Studios

Dream Productions was supposed to be produced by Walt Disney Animation Studios. 187.255.220.3 (talk) 02:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a source for this? SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 15:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Complete the "reception" section

Hi, I'm here to see if the "Reception" section could be expanded, as it's rather bland, with only Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic scores. Therefore, I'd prefer to add the following professional reviews: The Times Empire The Guardian The Boston Globe The A.V. Club IndieWire Slate The Daily Beast Collider and Screen Rant. I'm asking user @SleepDeprivedGinger: to fix the problem. 181.78.209.198 (talk) 19:55, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why me specifically? SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SleepDeprivedGinger: I called you because you've contributed a lot to the article and improved it. But I understand if you don't want to do that; in that case, I'll have to call other users like @Higher Further Faster:, @Movieknower59:, and @YoungForever:. So, tell me what you think of this proposal. 181.78.209.199 (talk) 21:14, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a bad idea, as it is a good idea to showcase more reviews to demonstrate the series' critical response. It's not that I wouldn't want to do it, it's just that I don't see why you can't do it. You brought up the idea, why not help out yourself? SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]