This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan
@Orlando Davis You really must be more careful about removing tags and making statements that are untrue. In this edit you state: " I added inline citations and removed failed verification since that was added because the editor Lamona noted on the article of deletion page that she added it because she doesn't own the book. Which is not a reason to add a lack of sources note." That is not true. It has nothing to do with whether I "own" the book, and you should not state that I said that. Thank you, Lamona (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I sincerely apologize for saying that you added the tag because you don't own the book. And I value your hard work and input in the article. I must have gotten confused. However, as a confirmed user, I had every right to make changes once I had heavily edited the article. Also, many disruptive editors learn to mask their disruptive behavior by following the rules well enough to get away with it. I know that's not you; you're actually a great Wikipedian, and I value that. But my issue was, how can you know if tags are warranted if you claim that you have never read the book since you claimed that it may not exist? But everyone, including myself, can make well-meaning mistakes. I must have gotten confused. Again, I value your hard work and input. Your input was critical in improving the article. Orlando Davis (talk) 18:53, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
