Jump to content

Talk:Daniil Trifonov discography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listDaniil Trifonov discography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on October 28, 2019.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 2, 2018Featured list candidateNot promoted
May 11, 2019Featured list candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 5, 2018.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the discography of pianist Daniil Trifonov includes one Grammy Award-winning album and two others that were nominated?
Current status: Featured list

Updating

[edit]

This page really needs updating. I just included one of the three new albums that are missing, but I have very little free time and would appreciate it if someone could help out. Ron Oliver (talk) 12:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

I'm trying to understand why List of musical works recorded by Daniil Trifonov exists in addition to this discography--they seem to present the same information in two different forms, and they were started by the same editor, Zingarese. The Trifonov biography currently does not link to List of musical works recorded by Daniil Trifonov, which makes it seem especially redundant. Unless I'm missing something, I think if there are useful sources in it they should be copied here, and then it should be redirected. blameless 00:46, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Blameless The lead of the musical works one explicitly explains the difference, so it would be good to address that if you're arguing for a merge still. Aza24 (talk) 04:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How valuable is that distinction? I ask because the musical works list is linked only from classical music lists, so if it is indeed presenting valuable information, surely it should be referenced by other pages? blameless 14:54, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't be against the merge. The article was created as part of a fork, but it was so long ago that I can't recall the exact circumstances. All I remember is the table on the new separate article was made by an editor who has long been indefinitely blocked. [1] Zingarese talk · contribs (please Reply to icon mention me on reply; thanks!) 23:17, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]