The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Move the link for Scotland to where it first appears.
Y
Rachel Aviva Pollack needs to be introduced.
Y
Painting of Jerome that became inspiration for the seated position—the caption requires additional text to show the origin of the work—'Cornelis Cort, Girolomo Muziano, Saint Jerome Penitent in the Wilderness (undated), Tartu University Library.
Y can you rework it.
Readers may be unfamiliar with the biblical story—a summary of it should be included in this section.
Y
It may be worthwhile including a short biographical summary about the artist here—entirely optional, but imo it improves the article a lot.
Y already did, you can see
Use Leonardo’s full name.
Y
2 Provenance
Link Dudley Carleton - he should be introduced in the text.Y
Carleton is ambassador for James I who is King of England at that time in The Hague and also an admirer for fine art. Rubens and Carleton met in September 1616 after Carleton had been promoted from his former ambassadorship in when he encountered his old acquaintance Tobie Matthew and George Gage at destination spa cause he suffered gallstone. During this encounter, they escorted Carleton to Antwerp, where he visited artists' studios, including Rubens's. Carleton decided to purchase The Wolf and Fox Hunt with help from Matthew, Gage and William Trumbull, but negotiations fell through when Rubens sold the painting to the Duke of Aarschot. However, Rubens agreed to paint a smaller version for Carleton in exchange for a chain of diamonds. Agus Damanik (talk) 14:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Link National Gallery of Art and give its location.
Y
who received it as part of a negotiation with Rubens – is redundant and can be deleted, as the text reappears in a similar form further down in the paragraph.
Y
entirely by Rubens himself – himself is redundant.
Y
However, Rubens – However seems unnecessary here.
Y
April 28, 1618 – a minor point, but 28 April, 1618 is preferable, as the numbers are separated.
Y
Later, in 1628 – Later is redundant.
Y
'Viscount’ (not viscount) in the link.
Y
that was held by Christie, Manson & Woods on the first day of the sale on June 17, 1882 - 'held at Christie’s, on 17 June, 1882‘?.
why change the name into Christie's. At this time, the name is Christie, Manson & Woods
agreed. AM
Who were Duncan, Keatley and Jamieson?
They are their attendant, do I need to remove it
Yes, their names are unimportant here. AM
Y already removed
Introduce Christopher Beckett Denison.
Y
sold it to the United States – this makes no sense—‘sold it to the United States Government’?
Y already removed and a new information
What is the painting's exhibition history, other than it is on display at the NGA?
*Y
3 Description
Link oil paint; Book of Daniel.
Y
Unlink realism, as it is within quotes.
Y
had access to exotic animals due to his role as a court painter - why would this be true?
Y
eighty years old – consider simplifying to ‘80’,
Y
of the incident – is redundant text.
Y
'The Sketch of a lion by Rubens' image is in the wrong section.
Y
'The Study for Daniel' image is causing sandwiching (MOS:SANDWICH), and should be removed.
Move the link to Daniel to where he first appears in the text.
Y
Consider linking praying.
Y
Leopards – why are these mentioned, are they depicted in the painting?
Y already removed
4 References
Ref 9 PubHist; Ref 14 the art inspector – what makes you think they are both reliable sources?
The ref 9 i realize is quite not reliable. Will change it
Y
The ref 14 is quite trusty, the one running the website and the writer for the article is having master in Art History. I don't know, i love if you have differed opinion
Y
N She is not a published author or academic, and her degrees not make her or the others reliable on Wikipedia.
Ref 1 and Ref 13 appear to be from the same source (NGA website).
Y already removed
5 External links
The link here also appears in the references section, and so should not be included here. This means the Commons link should be moved to the references section (to avoid it being on its own).
Y
6 Images
'Daniel in the Lion's Den c1615 Peter Paul Rubens' requires a US copyright tag.
Y
'Dying Alexander-Uffizi.1' is incorrectly licensed.
Y
'Cornelis Cort, da Girolomo Muziano, San Girolamo' requires a US copyright tag.
Y
'Peter Paul Rubens 077' requires a US copyright tag.
Y
An interesting article to read. I will be reading up to see if if other sources of information are available, and will add comments if needs be. In the meantime, please go ahead with addressing the above comments, I will cross them out when they appear to be sorted (please add a Y), and add a small cross (N) if there is still an issue. No rush as it's Christmas... Amitchell125 (talk) 11:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above issues have been addressed. I now need to go through the article again to check the prose. If you don't mind I will sort out any minor issues myself, please revert if I make an error. Amitchell125 (talk) 14:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
), and add a small cross (
) if there is still an issue. No rush as it's Christmas... Amitchell125 (talk) 11:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC)