Talk:Cubical atom

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Electrons with antiparallel spin form a fermi heap , higher density, higher electric repulsion. This is correlated with Hunds rule that parallel spins are of lower energy.

Electronpair bonding is not because of lower electronic repulsion. Its because of delocalisation ( lower kinetic energy) and nucleus electron attraction (lower potential energy.

09:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)~ Laurens — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurens houben (talk • contribs) 09:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Langmuir

In his 1919 paper, Langmuir did not propose a cubical atom, but a series of concentric spherical shell and thus a spherical atom. Only the second shell is divided into 8 cells, each containing a stationary electron. In his drawings of molecules, there are cubical arrangements of electrons in an atom, but he clarifies: "The lines connecting the electrons in these figures are used merely to give a better perspective of the arrangement of the electrons and of course should not be taken as representing the boundaries of the atoms." QuodScripsiScripsi (talk) 09:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]