Talk:Common App
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Common App article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | On 28 June 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Common Application to Common App. The result of the discussion was moved. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.commonapp.org and http://admissions.cornell.edu/apply/firstyear/completefreshmanapplication.pdf. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2006031610000462. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Rebranding
[edit]The Common App just released a new branding, with a new logo and potentially officially changing their name to "Common App", as that's how it now appears on the logo. Not entirely sure what to do about the logo, if the current file gets a new version or an additional file is created, one for the new and one for the old. I would suggest that the page be moved to "Common App", with "Common Application" as a redirect there, but I don't know for sure if Common App is their official name now. Eiim (talk) 16:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi chloe 110.175.10.111 (talk) 13:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 28 June 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) TarnishedPathtalk 11:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Common Application → Common App – WP:COMMONNAME. Seems like the official website uses just "Common App", not "Common Application". Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Raladic (talk) 21:10, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support, this seems to be the official name for all but the legal entity (which remains "The Common Application, Inc."), and anecdotally the name that I hear most often by far as well. Eiim (talk) 05:51, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Higher education has been notified of this discussion. Raladic (talk) 21:10, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support. I looked at the first 5 pages of Google News hits and nearly all used Common App: US News & World Report, BigFuture, Forbes, The Hoya, Higher Ed Dive, National College Attainment Network, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Inside Higher Ed, Business Insider, The Knight Crier (appears to be a high school student paper), Education Week. All are recent publications. I excluded repeats articles in the same publication and college admissions pages and other non-news sites that populated the results—though perhaps college and university pages should be considered reliable for usage. A common pattern is to use Common App in headlines, use Common Application on first mention in the article body, and then use Common App through ought on all subsequent mentions. I counted these as using "Common App". Regarding repeats, Forbes publishes on Common App data rather frequently, and I did note their usage here was mixed within the same article. Princeton Review switches back and forth but leads with the long name (Application). This fairly quick review did not turn up any publications that exclusively or overwhelmingly use the long name. --MYCETEAE 🍄🟫—talk 23:33, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.