Talk:Chloronitramide anion/GA1

GA review

Unsuccessful. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:31, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Mrfoogles (talk · contribs) 05:48, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs) 02:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this isn't quite ready for GA yet. The biggest issues are with criteria 1b and 3a:

1b: it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections... The lede here is not a summary of the main body of the area; it contains mostly information not present elsewhere in the article.
3a: it addresses the main aspects of the topic... The article doesn't have any discussion of the chemical structure, properties, or details on its possible toxicity or what it reacts with. In large part, this seems to be based on the newness of the compound, with only the discovery paper and one other paper discussing it. We may need to wait a year or three for additional research in order to have enough information for a GA.

Additionally, there are issues with 1a (a "why" tag, and some grammar issues under potential toxicity), 2b (toxicity information needs to comply with WP:MEDRS), and 5 (there seems to be some substantial recent back-and-forth changes to the article).

Best of luck with future GAs, and I hope to see this article reach GA someday when more research is available. Best, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.